Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob and George (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Bob and George
The result was Speedy keep. With the grounds for nomination withdrawn as inaccurate, there's no more reason to hold an AfD about this article than about any other article on the encyclopedia. Amusingly enough, the grounds for a speedy keep decision specifically include a procedural PROD where the nominator votes "keep." Non-admin closure; if wrong, slap with large, hairy fish. --Kizor 11:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC) AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nomination. Expired prod with rationale "non-notable webcomic". References are indeed minimal but the article has been on Wikipedia for years and I doubt it would have seen that much action unless it did have a following. Pascal.Tesson 06:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Extra comment It now appears that this is not an expired prod. Rather, the prod tag was put up, taken down and revert-warred over. In any case, looking back at the two previous AfD, I'm definitely learning towards Keep. Pascal.Tesson 06:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 08:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep noticable for its role in the development of a genre/artform. Article is well written. --Martin Wisse 11:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.