Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non notable software, prod removed. Wuh Wuz  Dat  16:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Taelus (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to (and list at) BBC Multimedia. I can only verify this through BBC press releases but the publisher is notable. Redirect per WP:PRODUCT (I don't think an AfD was really necessary). Marasmusine (talk) 18:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Delete a worthless stub no one cares about, as if children come here and read about a bunch of children's movies and kid games. 72.150.245.144 (talk) 12:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Marasmusine. Polarpanda (talk) 14:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete each of these games is notable, but the mere repackang of them as one item isn't. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: They are individually notable, but not both of them packaged together. Joe Chill (talk) 00:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.