Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob the Squirrel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 06:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Bob the Squirrel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable comic strip; in fact it boasts on its website that it is "the best daily comic strip no one has ever heard of." That's kind of the definition of "not notable". This article has been unreferenced since 2007. In a search for references I found only a couple of passing mentions in stories about something else. MelanieN (talk) 03:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - The only reliable source that covers the cartoon in-depth is the Rome Sentinel, which also publishes the cartoon and is therefore not independent. Unless another source can be found, it fails WP:GNG. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found two sources, neither of which are strong enough to warrant this series having an article at this point in time. The series does appear to be mildly popular in that it has a dedicated fan base, but none of this translated into enough coverage for it to pass notability guidelines as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: sorry Bob...Vrac (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with what's stated above. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.