Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobbi Shaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as another week has formed nothing else (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  06:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Bobbi Shaw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: Sorry but she is NOT a notable actress. Quis separabit? 06:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NACTOR because of major roles in many notable films. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 12:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - she was an important part of the AIP stock company in the 60sDutchy85 (talk) 14:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 17:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly insufficiant sources. Her multiple roles are not at the level of significant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have added some extra information and references to highlight her notability Dutchy85 (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes NACTOR with multiple role. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Running through a WP:BEFORE search, particularly in books, there appear to be several sources which gives further weight to the arguments that WP:NACTOR applies here and the sourcing problem is WP:SURMOUNTABLE. Mkdw talk 06:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.