Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobbs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Bobbs

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a hoax, a neologism and/or vanispamcruftisement. Merriam-Webster doesn't list it and there are only 207 ghits for this context. MER-C 04:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete either a hoax or neologism, fails WP:V either way. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a hoax. JuJube (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per TenPoundHammer and WP:V. I personally was leaning towards a neologism, but if it's a hoax, good enough reason to delete anyway. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a hoax. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.