Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby dabble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. The claims in the article move it clearly from WP:NFT into WP:CSD blatant hoax. JohnCD (talk) 22:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Bobby dabble

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. WP:MADEUP WP:NEOLOGISM. Oh, how I wish we had a speedy deletion criterion for these type of articles... Singularity42 (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete If I am reading right this is one of the most commonly used words and it was madeup on 26 Dec 2009. No google hits to assert notibility.   GB fan  talk 21:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom. The claims in the article deserve a deletion per WP:CSD.  Favonian (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as vandalism. Total cobblers. Completely impossible for a word to achieve that notability in such a short time, and extremely unlikely that anyone would want to use it anyway. Peridon (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, total bollocks. Jennifer500 (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and warn originator. Woogee (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Nominated for speedy delete as hoax. I see no need to keep this around for a week. Hairhorn (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.