Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobered


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete JodyBtalk 16:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Bobered

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates WP:NAD, because it is a guide to a slang word. Ships at a Distance (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Also, the spread of this word beyond some high school students has yet to be demonstratod.    — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 21:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - This word cannot be deleted on the premise that there really is no other way to accommodate the rise of a term that has spawned from a reliable source and whose existence can be proved on the basis of several true sources. Reliv1908 (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC) — Reliv1908 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep: An encyclopedia should not be limited to events, people, and locations, it needs to all-inclusive so that anyone who needs to refer to the information has a source on that information and learn about everything there is to know. Additionally the article is not a dictionary term, but a description of a word that includes everything from its birth to its significance, the same format as that of a biography of a human being. Cardsfan06 (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC) — Cardsfan06 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete looks like something that was made up one day by a group of friends in school. Wildthing61476 (talk) 22:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete According to http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bober it means three totally different things than this article suggests. To me, this is a student trying for his 15 minutes fame. Peridon (talk) 22:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing to prove that this isn't some random term without notability and without significance. Nyttend (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete and borderline speedy (G3) per WP:NFT and WP:HOAX. MuZemike  ( talk ) 22:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Appears to be WP:HOAX, a search finds no reference of the term outside of WP. Even if there was such a word, it would fail WP:NEO. — Cactus Writer |   needles  22:55, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Snowball delete and FYI I deleted the "Origin of the Word" section because it purported to mention two non-notable high-school students by name and therefore I felt it has WP:BLP issues. --Jaysweet (talk) 22:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I like to give the benefit of the doubt but I couldn't find any sort of reliable source for this. --Banime (talk) 23:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per most everybody. Edward321 (talk) 00:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:NFT. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.