Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobertism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. brenneman (t) (c) 05:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Bobertism
No factual content, created by friends who thought it was amusing...after originally fixing it up thought better of it and decided to mark it for deletion Robbjedi 02:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

It does have factual content. While I have to agree that it was amusing that is not a good criterion for deleting it. It is a factual article detailing facts about a religion. just because it is not a very mainstrwam religion does not give you grounds to discriminate against it. You are trying to make excuses to delete content that you disagree with. Soem people might find it sacriligeous but that is not a good reason to delete it.


 * Delete. Non-verifiable.  Non-notable.  Even a new religion needs to become established before it can be in an encyclopedia.  Good luck. &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 03:30, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete non-notable/vanity. "Me and my classmates were bored after school, and now wikipedia gets to suffer for it." Wikipedia is not here to immortalize the cooky zaniness that freshmen find themselves involved in at uni. Dude! Wheres me beer bong?!Dxco 03:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I notice that the author created a number of pages linking together on the topic. Uffda. Dxco 03:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.