Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The nom makes a good case, and the article fails on at least two other speedy grounds (no context, and A7) Orderinchaos 12:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Bobman
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article about a non-notable comic book character. No evidence of existence, let alone notability, provided. Mattinbgn\talk 10:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * NOTE: This is a contested PROD, no reason for contesting provided. -- Mattinbgn\talk 10:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 10:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete and salt per WP:CSD. Nothing worth keeping here.  –Moondyne 12:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. This can't be speedied because CSD4 only applies to pages deleted via xfd. Kotiwalo (talk) 12:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.