Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodcast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 00:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Bodcast
Bodcast, porncast, podnography... is there no limit to the number of neologisms used to describe the inherently obvious extension of podcasting to pornmongery? For consistency with the others, which seem to achieve consensus delete pretty fast, I nominate this. Perhaps it would be best to describe all the newly-coined terms in Podcast, redirect and have done with it. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 10:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The Podnography AFD has 5 "me too" delete votes followed by 2 keep/merge from non-anons, and since I was one of the keep voters, I wouldn't call it "achieved consensus to delete pretty fast". Also Porncasting has never been AFDed; I don't think anybody knew about it before - I tagged it for merging just now. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 10:55Z 


 * Here's the AfD debate: Articles for deletion/Porncasting. I think you might need ot be a bit more careful in flinging around accusations of bad faith as well. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 11:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see, sorry for that allegation. I checked history and talk... didn't realize it was a deleted-then-recreated article that nobody renominated (or nominated for speedy as repost).  What I meant by "nobody knew about it" was that the other two articles didn't link to it (nor have merge notices), and nobody on the other AFD mentioned it.  Obviously you have more experience than me in these matters since you participated in the AFD for porncasting. :) &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 12:59Z 


 * Keep, Merge with Podnography and Porncasting. Merging all the podcasting-related mini articles to one article would be OK too (Podcasting itself is too long though).  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 10:52Z 


 * OK, I agree in principle with the merger of all foocasting articles into a single place, since there is anever-ending stream of neologisms generated (as expected) by this expanding technology. The question is, what do we call it?  My favourite would be "List of podcruft" but I sense that might be controversial :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 11:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I totally agree to making a List of neolojizzums and moving all *blog* *pod* shit in there. --Timecop 05:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * merge as above -- Marvin147 02:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep it. I would not delete the term just yet. This is an early term, yes, but a very potent one that could and by the looks of how the media has picked up on it, will be very popular. Also, it definitely has meaning. I have heard the term tossed around in daily speech between several different people.
 * Delete, Seriously not noteworthy. Incognito 04:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - rubbish - Femmina 05:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this rubbish for now --Timecop 05:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for now? More like forever. --Hosterweis 06:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge Not worthy of more than one article. A.J.A. 07:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even close to Wikipedia standards. Cptchipjew 08:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * early+could+will be = crystal ball. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 19:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Not noteworthy. --Depakote 11:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete castcruft. Proto t c 13:56, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Merge with Bodnography as I suggested on the page when I first came across the article. Daniel Case 16:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * How about merging all of the various foocasting variants into Podcasting genres? - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 18:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * How about DELETEing them all? Tapir
 * Now why didn't I think of that? ;-) - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 19:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete utterly useless. Jmax- 19:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Forallah 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 *  Delete per above - useless pod-related shite. Eusebeus
 * Delete neoligism... WhiteNight T 08:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.