Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodily harm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to grievous bodily harm. Non-admin closure. Jfire (talk) 06:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Bodily harm

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Idiosyncatic, unreferenced, original research. There is no "medical idea of grievous bodily harm" distinct from the legal and common-sense concept, and the article goes downhill from there into a series of tropes specific to a now-banned user. An article on grievous bodily harm already exists to deal with the normal meaning of the term: I suggest that this article either be made into a redirect to that term, or deleted completely. The Anome (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Edison (talk) 18:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. and Edison. No point redirecting; the term is too vague to be useful. JohnCD (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to self-harm.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to grievous bodily harm per The Anome. Bearian (talk) 01:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.