Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Body Fetish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 15:13Z 

Body Fetish

 * — (View AfD)

This is an unverified, neologism, and is wholly original research. Furthermore it appears to be WP:SPAM created to push an external link per this version (I removed the link per WP:EL) and the fact that the originator added this link to many other articles. WP:AGF, but this appears to be an attempt to sell products. Delete.--Isotope23 18:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * del per nom. `'mikkanarxi 18:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete — I believe it fits the criteria. Robotman1974 18:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment — I just checked one of the references cited (Gates, Katharine. Deviant Desires: Incredibly Strange Sex. Juno Books. ISBN 1-890451-03-7) and I found nothing about this supposed fetish in that book. Robotman1974 18:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Which criteria? I was going to CSD it but I didn't see one that fit... I may have missed something though.--Isotope23 18:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The criteria I was citing is "Blatant advertising"; considering the link that had been included, and also considering the same link was added to many articles by the same user. I don't see how the remaining content of the article can stand on its own. Robotman1974 18:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah... G11... Like I said, I may have missed something.--Isotope23 19:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Seems a WP:N subject matter, may be it should re writen with WP:RS or a clean up tag is what is needed ?RaveenS 19:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment it may seen notable but the problem is that there is no evidence at all that the various fetishes listed in the article have ever been referred to as "Body Fetishes". It could be rewritten, but the fact of the matter is that the fetishes listed in the article are somehow a gestalt under this term is wholly original research... that is why they each have their own articles (well the ones that are verifiable anyway).--Isotope23 20:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - sounds very made-up and I can't find any reliable sources to backup the information in this article. Jayden54 21:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Mukadderat 18:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.