Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodyshock:Born with two Heads


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was d e lete. east. 718 at 07:34, November 24, 2007

Bodyshock:Born with two Heads

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about one individual TV programme episode is not notable - we don't even have an article about the Bodyshock series, so we shouldn't have one about an individual episode, unsourced original research. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 05:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: This show isn't notable, neither is this specific episode. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, we do have an article about the series, at a different title, BodyShock just noticed - gonna create a redirect.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 05:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment:Hmm, I took your word on that one. Anyhow, the episode itself is still not notable. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, and it's an unlikely typo so a redirect would be no good. This is unencyclopedic and a summary of a TV show, which is what Wikipedia is not for.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 05:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep."The boy in the bubble"Was another one of the articles who described an article about a bodyshock video.So why delete this one?IslaamMaged126 (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

If the David Vetter article wasn't deleted,why delete Manar Maged?Otherwise we wouldn't create articles like these,describing T.V shows about a living person.IslaamMaged126 (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete PER NOM. WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Bearian&#39;sBooties (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian'sBooties (talk • contribs)
 * Comment. This is more of an entry on the person than the episode. It doesn't mention runtime, the documentary maker or anything you'd expect of a documentary or episode article. Together with a lack of sources, I'm leaning towards deletion. If sources show up, I'd support a rename. - Mgm|(talk) 00:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Response to ''*Comment. This is more of an entry on the person than the episode. It doesn't mention runtime, the documentary maker or anything you'd expect of a documentary or episode article. Together with a lack of sources, I'm leaning towards deletion. If sources show up, I'd support a rename. -''. I fixed and found out the information you wanted.IslaamMaged126 (talk) 15:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Article's creator made a ton of new pages about a nonnotable subject and event. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 07:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.