Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing 767-611


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Boeing 767-611

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable whimsical project Petebutt (talk) 01:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete the article is largely original research.  The prototype isn't notable, and it isn't related to the Boeing 767 in any way. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - if NASA has written 70 pages on it, I'll call it notable.  " Pepper "  @ 02:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * One NASA study does not an article make!!!--Petebutt (talk) 09:17, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Why not? An aircraft is generally notable if it is verifiably — through reliable sources — a distinct "type" as demonstrated by any one or more of the following criteria: 6. The aircraft has received a distinct model number from a builder or manufacturer of other notable aircraft.  " Pepper "  @ 15:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- unsourced original research. The document linked about is by Boening, and is thus not an independent, secondary source. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Aircraft companies produce design studies all the time mostly non-notable and forgotten about. MilborneOne (talk) 18:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This was never an aircraft, just a proposal. If properly sourced, some of this info could go in some article on the history of jet aircraft development. Not notable for a article on this "aircraft". MB 03:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.