Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing B-29 Superfortress Survivors (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep because afd was used in an edit conflict. + snowball keep. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Boeing B-29 Superfortress Survivors

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrislk02 (talk • contribs) 2007/05/24 15:52:25
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletions.  -- Carom 17:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep &mdash; Satisfactory article, and nominator couldn't even bother to give a justification for the deletion. (I also checked the article history.) &mdash; RJH (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

oringially nomianted the original version for deletion. The discussion yeilded a compromise which is currently implemented. The articles original creator was angry with the changes and re-nominated for deletion. He nomination was faulty so I helped him, however he failed to provide a reason.
 * Keep - article is well-referenced and provides historical context for the remaining aircraft. This is much more than an indiscriminate collection of information.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - What actually happened here is long and confuysing. Look at the orignial versions in the edit history.  I
 * Keep in its current state. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep no need to delete --rogerd 19:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep This is not a legitimate AfD; this was posted to AfD because of a disagreement over content and style after the resolution of the previous AfD. The issues should be resolved by the editors at the talk page.  --Kevin Murray 20:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article's lead is a bit ambiguous, seems like it's about the plane itself and the page should probably be moved so that survivors is spelled with no capital, I don't think it's a proper noun here. IvoShandor 21:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ivo, feel free to copy edit the lead. Piotr Mikołajski 08:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah, and Keep per points above. IvoShandor 21:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Speedy Keep: What are we discussing anyway? Is this just a "throw it against the wall" nomination? A second nomination should be more specific, so we don't cover the same ground again. This AfD never should have been opened, and it should be closed immediately. Dhaluza 22:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: This AfD is great waste of time which could be used for improving this article, referencing etc. Piotr Mikołajski 08:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)