Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boethusians

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 17:40, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

Boethusians
copy-and-pasted from http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=1232&letter=B
 * If it is a copyright problem, list it on Copyright problems, not here. -- Infrogmation 21:11, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * First of all, it's not copied and pasted. It has been edited by me. Second of all, it is not a copyright problem. The Jewishencyclopedia.com is public domain. Remove this page from this list ASAP and please pay attention to public domain/copyright distinction (and Wikipedia policies) in the future). --Briangotts 02:58, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * "You may search, retrieve, display, download, and print content from the Service solely for your personal, internal use, and shall make no other use of the content without the express written permission of JE.com and the copyright owner (or its authorized agent) of such content. You will not modify, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale, create derivative works, or in any way exploit, any of the content, in whole or in part, found on the Service.", . Megan1967 06:59, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * The text (which has been modified) comes from a work whose copyright expired something on the order of 20 or 30 years ago (1905 Jewish Encyclopedia). The operators of Jewishencyclopedia.com may post a notice to whatever effect they wish, but that does not give the notice legal effect. The text is public domain and may be reused and/or modified. --Briangotts 15:13, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's not a copyright problem, since the copyright on the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia expired long ago.  Many articles on Wikipedia are based in whole or part on articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia.  We even have a template for it,  . Jayjg (talk)  17:35, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Inappropriate Vfd recommendation from inexperienced user. --Dzimmer6 21:26, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, encyclopedic topic, PD source. Antandrus 05:08, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, encyclopedic of historical interest. No copyright issues. JFW | T@lk  21:43, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.