Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogdan Stoica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Bogdan Stoica

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability in any reliable secondary source. Only cites are to promotional/sports websites. Speedily deleted on February 21, 2011 (see here) - then recreated in March. Bbb23 (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep he is the WAKO-Pro Intercontinental champion; there are kickboxers way less important than him on wikipedia; please check the World Association of KickBoxing Organisations, it is a confirmation: http://www.wakopro.org/en/NewsDetail.aspx?Ctn=84526 in boxing, all the world champions or the boxers who fought for the title have profiles on wikipedia. i do not see why to be different in kickboxing Defineterminology (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2011 (CET)
 * Note. Defineterminology has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of Cyperuspapyrus, who was under a one-week block at the time Defineterminology added his Keep, and is now indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep A highly notable kickboxer, having held significant titles. Also, a decent article. I will improve it if it is kept. -- WölffReik (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2011 (CET)
 * Keep WAKO Intercontinental champion is just a step below world champion, and makes him among the top kickboxers in his weight class. Papaursa (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. The WAKO champion assertion was added after my nomination (by the sock puppet). At this point, I'd very much like to hear from non-kick boxing fans about (1) whether they think the title makes him sufficiently notable and (2) the quality of the cite in support of the assertion. If both of those elements are satisfied, I would withdraw my nomination.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The fact may have been added by a sockpuppet, but it's still correct. His high world ranking is in line with the boxing criteria for notability and the source is the WAKO web site and I'd say that's the most authoritative source for WAKO. Astudent0 (talk) 13:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.