Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boghos torosian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Boghos torosian
0 Google hits for his name. Makes an odd claim to notability, but no verifiability Porqin 13:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete in current form if it doesn't change from the unsourced, original research, NPOV "inspiration" type language, I can't endorse it remaining on wikipedia. If it got reworded I'd be saying just delete for original research, and unverifiable.   i kan reed 13:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verifiable sources can be cited. The POV can be reworded, but I'm mostly concerned about unverfiable claims and a lack of Ghits. That makes me suspicious of a hoax. Scorpiondollprincess 14:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Scopiondoll.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot verify any of the information in the article, without sources this appears to be a non notable person per WP:BIO. DrunkenSmurf 15:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete guess his people are just going to have to inspire themselves.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  19:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable. Fails Geogre's Law. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 19:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NN, WP:BIO -- |  Shishir Rane  | talk | 05:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.