Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogus MC's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Bogus MC's

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced article about a minor band that has at best borderline notability. Does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability of bands. The proposed deletion was challenged, without comment, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 16:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Only coverage in RS is a very brief mention in a USA Today piece. Myspace and such won't pass muster. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 07:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notability is clearly demonstrated in the article itself - the 'history' section, for example. Bogus!Colon el  Tom 12:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable and fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG, as the only solid source in the article (USA Today) provides only a passing mention of it, failing the "significant coverage" requirement.--Slon02 (talk) 03:10, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.