Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bohr Theory and Balmer–Rydberg Equation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Bohr Theory and Balmer–Rydberg Equation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Material already covered completely in other articles; physics is okay, but most cites are to a quack theory book S  B Harris 01:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I would "usually" vote "merge into Bohr model", but after having read both articles and the merge discussion, I agree that all said in the nominated article is said better in the Bohr model, and would add that a redirect would be useless because of the unwieldy name. Thus delete. Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as essentially WP:OR - quoting one textbook does not an article make. Alternately, merge into Bohr model, per the suggestion on the page. Bearian (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with MS that there's nothing to be merged. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 15:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.