Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boilerplate clauses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Boilerplate clauses

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD was removed by author and provided the sources. Still contains OR and possibly NOT content. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 22:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep A Google Books search identifies at least seven books specifically about boilerplate clauses. Accordingly, this is a highly notable topic, and the article should be expanded and improved rather then being deleted. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  23:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  01:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly notable per Cullen, but should be cleaned up and probably moved to the singular after the AfD is closed. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.