Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boise State Effect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 00:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Boise State Effect

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant neologism; one hit at Google that's not this wiki article. AU Tiger » talk 05:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete as there are no sources that mention this "effect," only one source that mentions the game that the article claims inspired it. WP:MADEUP much? Epthorn (talk) 06:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete this term has existed under numerous names in the past, and will use other names in the future. There is no unique claim to this definition. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC) Delete as WP:NEO. JJL 15:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and LonelyBeacon. ↔NMajdan &bull;talk 14:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep This article might represent a buzz word, but it is currently a relevant buzz word. It should not be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.118.139 (talk) 03:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and LonelyBeacon. MECU ≈ talk 13:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.