Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojocore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted - blatant attack page. —  iride  scent  22:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Bojocore

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Neologism with no widespread usage.   results in 9 hits.  Contested prod.  ...  disco spinster   talk  00:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Probable hoax. If not, its still unencyclopedic.--CyberGhostface (talk) 00:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ref provided is a forum where is states "Only a couple of days after I coined the word ...." -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 01:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - weak attempt to start a meme/neologism. Marasmusine (talk) 07:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would almost say this qualifies as a speedy (patent nonsense), but there is an attempt at a source. This falls under WP:MADEUP. TN ‑ X - Man  15:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO.--Berig (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR cruft. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable neologism.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted as an attack page —  iride  scent  22:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.