Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boku no Watashi no Yūsha Gaku


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 14:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Boku no Watashi no Yūsha Gaku

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Another non-notable Weekly Shōnen Jump manga with no reviews from reliable sources or any other other third-party reliable sources found. Author also appears to be non-notable. Simply being serialized in a manga magazine doesn't make a work notable. Farix (Talk) 15:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As usual with these sorts of titles, all the search results are illegal scanlation sites or blogs. Absolutely no ANN reference which says it all, a lot of non-notable titles at least have some small mention on ANN. If this has none then it has very little chance of being notable. Dandy Sephy (talk) 15:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. For all the proposed reasons and for the lack of formality. It's an article about a magazine issue for Pete's sake!Spencer Divonn'io the Glorious 16:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anhydrobiosis (talk • contribs)
 * Comment The article's subject is a comic book series, not an issue of a magazine. Edward321 (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, plus scanlation level close to 0.(not notable even for scanlation readers) KrebMarkt 16:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * To put salt in the wound, its scanlation halted after 3 chapters and nothing new since +500 days. That show how notable it is in the english manga/anime fandom. KrebMarkt 22:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 22:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BK having no significant coverage in reliable third party sources and not even an ANN listing, which is the epitome of unnotable series (anyone else think that darn template should also go to stop this insanity?) -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 00:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Because its featured in the most popular and influential manga magazine, and because Google returns 188,000 hits for "Boku no Watashi no Yūsha Gaku". That's notable enough for me. Dream Focus (talk) 12:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: Google hits do not establish notability. Because it ran in Jump doesn't make it notable. As Dandy Sephy mentioned above, it doesn't even have an ANN reference (ANN Search); whereas some manga that haven't even run in this magazine have a passing mention. (Best example I have on hand) ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 22:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I looked it up on google and I got mostly scanlation sites, forums, and blogs. ~ Itzjustdrama C  ? 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.