Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bole Dembel Shopping Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nomination withdrawn. Courcelles 23:28, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Bole Dembel Shopping Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article that fails notability as well. Jetstreamer Talk 16:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Move: This article is about one of the first few modern western-style shopping centers in Ethiopia. The article is just badly written and mislabeled. It should be moved to Dembel City Center. It has a good first primary source; Dembel City Center website that can be used along with secondary sources: News articles that mention Dembel, more news articles: Ethiopia: DBE Moves to Foreclose Dembel.... You get the idea. This article is just badly written. I have begun improving it. I will however not move it until it is off review. አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) (talk) 14:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)




 * Move, given Janweh64's improvements to the article. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep (and rename), please search for variant names and in foreign sources before AfD nominations. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but it's not the nominator's responsibility to find sources for an unsourced article. The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Please become more famiilar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.--Jetstreamer Talk 12:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jetstreamer, sometimes the best way to bring attention to sub-par articles is to bring them up for review. At nomination, this article had ZERO sources and an incorrect name. What is the next move however. I think even you, the nominator, Jetstreamer will agree this AFD is no longer necessary. Can I now simply move this article and consider this issue resolved. Or is that up to an Administrator. &mdash; አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * An administrator should close this debate, but yes, I now support moving rather than deleting.--Jetstreamer Talk 22:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I will contact for closing this debate.--Jetstreamer Talk 22:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:BURDEN is part of a content policy, not a part of WP:Deletion policy. What WP:Deletion policy says in regard to WP:V is, "Reasons for deletion include...Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed".  Unscintillating (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.