Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bole India Jai Bhim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Bole India Jai Bhim

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not fulfilling WP:GNG and far away from WP:NFO. has references to gossip/unreliable/self-published sites.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep This film, of course, notable, fewer sources because the film isn't popular in Huge Marathi audience, Even I also could not find any reference to getting this pass GNG (literally) but this can be kept as old film and article is on Wikipedia since 3 years WikiLover97 (talk) 20:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , Please go through this WP:NEXIST, notability needs verifiable, reliable sources. and in this case we lack the sources at all.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I doubt the nomination as the nominator first removed sources than marked itself for deletion. I mean what hurry the nominator has to delete my created articles or articles created by my fellow wikimedians from Marathi Wikipedia, I don't have any clue. Whereas I could like to give some of the sources from well reputed Indian Newspapers to prove notability of this topic., , , . Similar baseless nominations have been made even in the past like here, here, here and more. Hope we find solution to this repetitive revenging attitude vandalism. Thank you. -- ✝iѵ ɛɳ  २२४० †ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Removed sources were blogs/gossip sites/self-published ones.
 * When it's up for AFD debate it's not needed that one should have some sort of hurry or harsh feelings, it's the phase one gets to check the contents and it's the strength, I would request the users instead of cursing and doubting others intentions, one can always go and actually improve the article using valid and reliable sources if they can. you may have something to say here as you were part of the Dixit AFD debate, thanks   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am seeing, as to how this passes NFILM. We seek for at-least 2 reviews in prominent publications of national/regional repute and there exists none, as of now. This is a completely non-notable festival. My searches for regional coverage does not reveal anything. TOI has been long-determined to be unreliable for determining notability in entertainment-AfDs courtesy the sheer volume of pay-for-spam they routinely publish.  (I was neutrally asked for my views over my t/p. I also note that the article-creator has been banned for sock-puppetry and the above !voter (Tiven) used to write hagiographic stuff about Ambedkar, upon whom the film seems to be based.)   &#x222F; WBG converse 11:53, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am seeing, as to how this passes NFILM. We seek for at-least 2 reviews in prominent publications of national/regional repute and there exists none, as of now. This is a completely non-notable festival. My searches for regional coverage does not reveal anything. TOI has been long-determined to be unreliable for determining notability in entertainment-AfDs courtesy the sheer volume of pay-for-spam they routinely publish.  (I was neutrally asked for my views over my t/p. I also note that the article-creator has been banned for sock-puppetry and the above !voter (Tiven) used to write hagiographic stuff about Ambedkar, upon whom the film seems to be based.)   &#x222F; WBG converse 11:53, 18 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep This film important and article is also important... please KEEP प्रसाद साळवे (talk)
 * , Any valid sources? And remember nothing is inherently notable, please have a look at WP:NRV thanks  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment - QueerEcofeminist user is a casteist Person, he just targeting Dr. Babasheb Ambedkar Related Articals like Bole India Jai Bhim, Yugpurush Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Balak Ambedkar. just look his history of editing he never help to article. like references or growing. but just ignore and keep article. QueerEcofeminist is also targeting specific user also. प्रसाद साळवे (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * delete — like I commented on Articles for deletion/Balak Ambedkar: after a thorough search on this article, and two others, I couldnt find anything regarding this film. This film is about a notable person. But the film itself is not notable. I tried to find reviews for the film, but I couldnt find it; nor the coverage. In this case, the film has not received significant coverage. The film fails generalised notability guidelines for films, as well as there are no other evidences of notability. Tiven has mentioned four references in his keep vote. One of them is about show details of the film (happens for every film, not a sign of notability), second news is about censor board of India giving release permission to the film. This also happens to every film which are about sensitive topics. The board evaluates the content of the film, if e film would hurt feelings of some particular religion, caste, community or something like that. This one news, is not a sign of notability again. One reference is about the director getting an award for the film, but the award isnt notable itself. The source from the hindu has a passing reference to the film. Nothing conforms notability of the film. Also, per WBG. — usernamekiran (talk)  18:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.