Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollywood-Arts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Bollywood-Arts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet the the requirements as per wp:corp,  notability has still yet to be established. As well as possible conflict with username for promotion as well. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 21:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable: all I could find on this organisation was self-published. I would say that I'm not sure that the creator has a coi problem: in my experience most editors creating a promotional website have a deal more expertise in how to make a wiki page than this editor.TheLongTone (talk) 21:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete fails notability. -- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete cannot find notability in third party resource. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregg1234 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – Everything I could find is self-published, nothing on Google News. — SamX‧☎‧✎‧ S  23:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.