Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollywood Dreams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting that non-English language sources/searches were not discussed. (The subject is a Hindi-language publication.) czar  15:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Bollywood Dreams

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem notable, a quick WP:BEFORE search did not bring up anything. Regards. — fr&thinsp;+  18:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * , what happened to SOFTDELETE? See RELISTBIAS. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * From what i know and what I usually see here in lots of cases, 2 relists is a minimum before a soft deletion happens. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Also to add, WP:RELISTBIAS is for discussions which "has already fully debated the merit of the article" as it clearly says in the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , please don't do that any further. The community authorized the fourth criterion of WP:NOQUORUM explicitly over a widely-advertised-RFC and your relists are adding to the administrative backlogs.
 * Obviously, you have a discretion to relist in exceptional scenarios but this is not such a case, either. &#x222F; WBG converse 18:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Read point 5 of the essay. And, it pretty much aligns with the discussed theme. &#x222F; WBG converse 18:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sent you a message on the talk page.
 * Sent you a message on the talk page.


 * Delete The link to the magazine takes you to an empty page, and I can't find any information on this magazine at all by searching. ManicSpider (talk) 11:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing on Bollywood Dreams as magazine from search engines, another promo page. PlotHelpful (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.