Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bomb Squad (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Intellivision games. czar 02:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Bomb Squad (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches turned up virtually no in-depth coverage of this video game other than trivial mentions and listings. Could be a redirect but editors insist on an article with virtually no sourcing consisting entirely of a plot summary.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Here's just one of the several that were already there: https://www.giantbomb.com/bomb-squad/3030-1426/  In what way does that have " virtually no in-depth coverage " or is just a "trivial listing" ? Andy Dingley (talk) 09:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - you do understand that is a wiki, and therefore not a reliable source?  Onel 5969  TT me 12:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Of course. You do understand, don't you, that this wasn't what you complained of. You claimed there was "no in-depth coverage", and clearly this is some.
 * Also I don't appreciate the way you are clearly stalking all of my edits at present and blanking or AfDing anything I touch, shouting "just not notable!" Andy Dingley (talk)
 * Comment - you do understand that for something to be in-depth it needs to be from a reliable source? btw, not stalking, but your edits create entries on the NPP, which I am trying to help out reducing the backlog. But thanks for the personal attack and agf.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  10:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * There are a number of sources mentioned in context with the Intellivision, and especially the Intellivoice. I'm not entirely sure I agree with the "no in-depth coverage" given the age of the game however since period pieces are hard to come by (which would have reviews of the game). My inclination for now is to redirect either to List of Intellivision games or to Intellivoice. --Izno (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect To List of Intellivision games per Izno.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per ZXCVBNM. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect - only existence can be verified, not the GNG. (The Giant Bomb wiki source doesn't help notability at all.) Sergecross73   msg me  19:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.