Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombarika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 19:45, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Bombarika

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recently released mobile game. Has it already established notability? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nominator.  FITINDIA   11:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt per above, per nom; repeatedly recreated from draft space. In any case, the reportage is—with the exception of blogs, zines and tablods—absolutely minimal—and only passing mentions anyway; there's nothing in any kind of relevant literature either. This is not a case of TOOSOON (yet!)—this is a solid case of spamming. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 11:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Never knew i helped someone's draft when he is a employer of the games, my bad. MayaZ使</b><b style="color: #99d5fe;">字</b><b style="color: #b2dffe;">斯</b><b style="color: #d4143a">Poke!</b>'' 07:30 PM, 22 June 2018
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt per Serial Number 54129 above, I can't find significant coverage from reliable, independent sources and a clear-cut violation of WP:COI/WP:PAID. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS (talk |c|em ) 12:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete is fine here. This is the only WP:RS review (as per WP:VG/S) covering the topic in some detail. --Izno (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, seems to fail WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete/SALT - article was created by an indefinitely blocked sockpuppet (User:Mayamaya7) who has a history of copy-vio and adding non-notable content, as well as creating or restoring articles already deleted or redirected per being non-notable, against WP:CONSENSUS.  R9tgokunks   ⯃  00:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.