Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombay Cricket Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Bombay Cricket Club

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Now closed restaurant that fails GNG. Coverage is all local as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 23:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Middle East, India,  and Oregon.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. The appropriate WP guideline for this article, a business, is WP:NORG, which includes the WP:AUD criterion: at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary. The sourcing in this article includes three substantive articles from The Oregonian, a newspaper with statewide circulation, as well as circulation in southern Washington state. This article easily meets the notability thresholds for both GNG and NORG, with the higher criterion of AUD. — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG (disclaimer: creator). I'm satisfied with amount of secondary coverage in a variety of reputable sources. I would ask the nominator to have a wider discussion about AUD or specific sources (specifically The Oregonian) instead of mass nominating restaurant entries at AfD. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Contrary to the claim in the intro, this restaurant meets both WP:GNG and WP:AUD. Please use caution when nominating articles for deletion as AfDs take up community resources. Many more contributions are needed in the article space! gidonb (talk) 10:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: nomination ideas are invalid. Closure has absolutely nothing to do with notability, and source regionality is not a requirement. ɱ  (talk) 21:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.