Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bon vivant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Bon vivant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is nothing but WP:DICDEF. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Soft redirect to Wiktionary. It's mentioned in several articles so it is something that is likely to be looked up. Thryduulf (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm also happy with disambiguation as suggested by Cnilep below. Thryduulf (talk) 10:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  16:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Dabify, based on article history. Until April~May 2020 a portion of the article's content was about Johnnie Cradock and Fanny Cradock, who wrote together under the pen name Bon Viveur. In May it was briefly a redirect to 1971 Bon Vivant botulism case. Way back in 2014, it was proposed for merger to Hedonism, but no discussion was started. That's at least three Wikipedia articles to disambiguate, which would coexist with the usual Wiktionary link. Cnilep (talk) 03:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -   t • c 14:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as dict def. The Cradock articles are quite entertaining, thank you for that, but the disambig argument seems like a stretch.  --Lockley (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: The discussion at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20 may have some bearing on this one, and vice-versa. Cnilep (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.