Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonadelle Ranchos Nine, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 04:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Bonadelle Ranchos Nine, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Like with Bonadelle Ranchos Five, California, the only coverage I can find is for Bonadelle Ranchos, California itself, not Bonadelle Ranchos Nine. Might be a subdivision or housing development of some sort, as there appears to be a series of these. FWIW, the businesses in this place according to Google Maps have an address in Madera. I'm just not convinced that this place meets WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm Bacon 02:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 02:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 02:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC) *

Comment. In did a Google search for "Bonadelle Ranchos- Subdivision #9" California filetype:pdf and came up with two PDF files. The first was Resolution to form Zone of Benefit “D” (CSA-22D) within County Service Area 22 (CSA-22)., DOC. ID NUMBER 2030, DATE REC’D 7/27/2016. On pages 1 (bottom) -2 (top), it stated

"In 2009, the LAFCO conducted a Municipal Services Review (MSR) for the greater Rio Mesa area which included studying all special district municipal services provided in the area. This included County Service Areas (CSA) 16 (Sumner Hill), 19 (Rolling Hills), 22 (Rio Mesa); Maintenance Districts 14 (Bonadelle Ranchos- Subdivision #9) and 57 (Brickyard Industrial Subdivision), Sierra Foothills Public Utility District, and Root Creek Water District."

The final one was Approval of a Resolution to Establish Zone of Benefit “E” within County Service Area 22 (CSA-22), DOC. ID NUMBER 3574, DATE REC’D (none). It had the same text as above on the bottom of page 1. Both mentioned Bonadelle Ranchos- Subdivision #9.

There is also a Bonadelle Ranchos Nine and a Bonadelle Ranchos Five mentioned in Madera County, California Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, February 2011 on page 1-5 under 1.3.1.5 Unincorporated Communities - Western Madera County subhead. Paul H. (talk) 05:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Paul H. (talk) 05:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah. I didn't think to search with subdivision.  I believe one of those pdfs did come up on my search, but my browser wouldn't open it. Hog Farm Bacon 05:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Additional Comment. More references to Bonadelle Ranchos no. 9 and by searching for Bonadelle Ranchos no. 9 in the search menu at Planning Forms and Documents. An example is Proposed Budgets for Special Districts, Madera County, For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2017. On page 21, this document states:

Maintenance District 14 – Bonadelle Ranchos No. 9, 2020-2021 Recommended Road Maintenance Budget

Maintenance District 14 is located in Madera County Supervisory District 1, approximately thirteen miles east of Madera and accessed west from State Highway 41 and south from Avenue 15. The District contains 183 parcels served by 3.90 miles of paved roads.

Bonadelle Ranchos Number 9 was formed On August 4, 1964 by Resolution 64-341 and is approximately 309 acres in size. When the District was formed there was no direct assessment set for road maintenance. This District is pre-Proposition 13 and receives a portion of property taxes to assist in road maintenance. These roads are minor rural County roads which are included in the County’s maintained road system. Paul H. (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SECONDARY and WP:MILL. It existed, and is verified by primary sources, but not in secondary sources. Ordinary ranch that fails my standards as a run-of-the-mill place; there are tens of thousands of special districts in the United States. Bearian (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: According to GEOFEAT, this must pass GNG. The sources in the article do not have SIGCOV from IS RS sources addressing the subject directly and indepth. The sources mentioned above do not have SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth and search results showing county forms and documents are not SIGCOV, they just a mention of the name. County records might be used to V content, but they are not IS for demonstrating notability. Simply naming a location is not legal recognition and it is not SIGCOV for GEOLAND.  // Timothy :: t | c | a  12:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.