Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonchester Bridge television relay station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Although the opinions are fairly evenly divided, the policy based opinions favor deletion. J04n(talk page) 00:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Bonchester Bridge television relay station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are no sources given that suggest any kind of notability of this generic relay station. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 18:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ( t  •  c ) 01:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I do not see how a relay station can be notable except as a structure, and there's no information here about that.  DGG ( talk ) 05:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I suspect that there are a lot of such articles. The relay station will often be a landmark and thus worth an article.  Or is this a sample nom, to be followed by a wholesale deletion nom?  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I highly doubt a structure with a height of 17 meters qualifies as a landmark. Most trees are higher than that. We have articles about some, but not many relay stations (try the search function if you're curious), and few of them bother to explain what makes them so important. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep  For whatever reason, there's a whole template of TV Transmitters in the UK, and most of the transmitters on the template have articles.  It seems that it would need to be there for the sake of completeness. Listmeister (talk) 21:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of meeting WP:GNG. The WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguements above are moot and not policy based (not to mention many of these articles are of dubious notability). Secret account 05:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.