Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bondage mitten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of bondage equipment. Stifle (talk) 11:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Bondage mitten

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be independently notable. No references demonstrate this to me. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Bondage equipment. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:03, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree with Kenilworth Terrace. Merge and redirect to Bondage equipment. -- The Anome (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - per imagws which proves its existence, factual article. Notable in the "bondage world" I guess.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 21:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and reference Lots of GBooks hits. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * merge  per kenilworth Someone65 (talk) 07:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most of the refs pointed to by the GBooks seem to be passing mentions of "mittens used for bondage." At best, those sources would support a dicdef article only. Currently the article is only a transwiki from Wipipedia, so no information would truly be lost in a Delete. But If someone were to prove me wrong and pull off a WP:HEY then I would be all for keep.-- RoninBK T C 08:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. RoninBK T C 08:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Bondage equipment. Not enough coverage to support an article on this topic alone.  Snotty Wong   spout 17:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of bondage equipment, with possibilities. The article fails WP:V. Unfortunately, the Google Books results aren't even sufficient for a dictionary definition. I spent several minutes trying to locate other sources, but couldn't easily find anything that met WP:RS. The contents will be in the page history, in case it turns out to be helpful to an editor building an article in the future. --Pnm (talk) 05:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of bondage equipment. No sources and no indication of significant coverage in independent sources. WP:ITEXISTS is explicitly WP:NOT a good reason for an article. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 17:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.