Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bondage tape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 03:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Bondage tape

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be independently notable. No references demonstrate this to me. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep with numerous hits on Google Books, News and Scholar. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 19:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Please source it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merrill Stubing (talk • contribs) 15:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If you look at the article history, you will see that I had already done so 10 minutes before making my comment here. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Reasonably sourced. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Kenilworth Terrace. Even a moment's Googlng would have found this source, and several others -- perhaps it would be a good idea to try this WP:BEFORE performing the nomination? -- The Anome (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - simply notable, in the "bondage world".--BabbaQ (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.