Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonel Ávila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 07:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Bonel Ávila

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator on the grounds that he was notable for having played in the Salvadoran top flight. Since this league is not confirmed as fully pro in reliable sources this does not confer notability per WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. Has not played in a fully professional league, nor played senior international football. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to cover GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - the subject fails both the general notabilty guideline and the subject-specific notability guideline, as the footballer hasn't received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league. Mentoz (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - where is evidence that top El Salvador league isn't fully professional? Nfitz (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - You are well aware of the inclusive nature of the FPL criteria, that those leagues not on the list are by definition not considered FPL at the moment and what you need to do if you feel there are grounds for the addition of any league, as discussed here. Fenix down (talk) 09:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - You are well aware that I'm simply asking where the evidence is that the league isn't fully professional. I'm not looking for an answer consisting of legalese Wikilawyering. Nfitz (talk) 04:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.