Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonestown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 04:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Bonestown
non-notable — J3ff 08:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. This is a person not a place. And it makes no claim of notability.Obina 10:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Tag added. --Whouk (talk) 10:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as non-notable vanity biography. Recommend the article author see WikiMe for writing biographies and/or WikiTree for writing genealogies. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 11:28Z 


 * Comment: At this point in the discussion, the discussion page was incorrectly deleted by user:DragonflySixtyseven. This action was not in compliance with the Deletion process.  The deletion discussion should have been simply closed and allowed to archive.  The old discussion is now restored.  Rossami (talk) 14:35, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

fixing incomplete afd nomination, page seems to be already deleted, no vote. -- MisterHand 15:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I know I voted on this earlier because it's on my watchlist. 2006-01-04 05:39:09 DragonflySixtyseven deleted "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonestown" (unnecessary) (just before deleting Bonestown for "vanity"). Why?  As far as I know AFD pages are never deleted, even when the article itself is speedy-deleted. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 20:19Z 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.