Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bongolesia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per consensus. SmashvilleBONK! 18:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Bongolesia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A fictitious African country being promoted by its creator. 39 Google hits suggest that it is non-notable. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:38, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Don't delete. It isn't self-published work, although the copyright owner did create the article, in part for disambiguation over the nature of Bongolesia's reality, or lack thereof, in this case.Jwomack94 (talk) 02:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Mansford, nice comment there. I thought there was a little statement on Wiki about not making personal attacks, slander, or calling people names? Anyhow, I've addressed your issues on the Bongolesia discussion page and have emailed you about it. Mmurphy1963 (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC) — Mmurphy1963 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete There seems to be nothing but in-universe information in this article and nothing especially encyclopedic to report. Movingboxes (talk) 09:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't seem notable (quick google search)  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 11:48, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete via RHaworth --Numyht (talk) 12:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability. Author is to be congratulated, however, for weaving in every possible stereotype about residents of "Dark Africa"-- let's see, uneducated, gullible, corrupt, want handouts, greedy...  I think the Wiki entry "will help explain to people and assist them in understanding" what a dick the author is. Mandsford (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Something self-published is seldom notable and there is no indication this is. Edward321 (talk) 00:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Horselover Frost (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't for things someone made up one day that aren't notable and lack reliable sources (i.e. the bulk of "references" seem to be blogs).  --Craw-daddy &#124; T &#124; 00:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.