Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonita Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 03:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Bonita Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. The only coverage that I could find about this magazine is the one hit from the scholar search, and it doesn't seem to be more than a mere mention - frankie (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Vacuous, spammy, unwikified orphan article about a latina fashion mag which is not the subject of substantial independent published coverage elsewhere. Carrite (talk) 16:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.