Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonnie Beecher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 09:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Bonnie Beecher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 21:43, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete two one-episode TV roles and chumming with notable people do not add up to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * When WP:RS produce WP:SIGCOV about people, it does add up to notability, even if the reason for the interest is because they chum with notable people. Please note she appeared on more than two TV series as well. —МандичкаYO 😜 00:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I think she does just about pass notability, the Star Trek episode is an important one. PatGallacher (talk) 23:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - she simply meets WP:GNG with in-depth and persistent coverage of her life. Her acting career includes appearances on major iconic television shows that make her memorable. Quite a few articles on her in newspapers.com archives - I will additional citations to her article. —МандичкаYO 😜 00:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep: appears to be notable in her own right, and many sources mention her as possible Dylan muse which might cause readers to want to learn more.  Pam  D  09:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:17, 12 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep: Added a reference. The subject has received enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. A sufficiently prominent role in an episode of the original series of Star Trek probably does amount to notability due to the enduring popularity of that series and the fact that they never stop repeating that series over and over and over again and will probably continue repeating it as long as television exists. James500 (talk) 02:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.