Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonnie Zindel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 16:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Bonnie Zindel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article gives the appearance of having sources establishing notability per WP:SIGCOV, but none appear to have any substantial coverage of the subject. The rest are personal profiles, conference attendee rosters, scheduled appearances, and trivial mentions. Was WP:PRODded for deletion but the author (who has a confirmed COI) removed the prod without any explanation or improvement. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, doesn't meet guidelines for WP:Notability. The references to NY Times articles are passing mentions, not profiles of this article's subject.   PK  T (alk)  18:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability case is very borderline (WP:BASIC), and removal of Template:AfD from a page during a discussion (see Bonnie Zindel: Difference between revisions) does not give confidence in the case for retention.—Baldy Bill (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Just noticed a page with this title was also deleted on 4 June 2009 on notability grounds.—Baldy Bill (talk) 20:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The deleted article was on the same person, but much less detailed (basically only what is now the "Personal" section of the article). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarification David. Baldy Bill (talk) 23:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.