Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bony Bullrich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  20:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Bony Bullrich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extremely promotional to the point this is essentially a press release, and most of the references are of no value Jac 16888  Talk 19:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    20:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - the sources don't support his notability or significance, or even the content written here and this article is pretty grand/promotional. Infancy? 11 images? Lengthy list of works? Its all too self-promotional. Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - The article in undoubtedly distinctly over-promotional, and a large proportion of the citations, even discounting several malformed ones, are either not from reliable sources or do not mention the subject. However, some of the citations are from apparently reliable sources (such as La Nacion) and do refer to the subject - and the malformed ones seem to have suffered in translation from Spanish Wikipedia and, looking there, a few more of these also look satisfactory. My Spanish is not good enough to be certain, but the subject does seem likely to me to have enough notability in Argentina to justify a shorter (and less promotional) article than the current one. PWilkinson (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Possible Keep per PWilkinson's statement. This article needs a lot of cleanup, but this can most likely be fixed with reliable, better-formatted and more accurate referencing and citations. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 04:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.