Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booger (2nd nomination)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP WITH POSSIBLE MERGE. moink 06:29, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Booger

 * Merge with mucus. Booger is not the proper scientific name-I agree it should be merged with Mucus.
 * Merge with mucus. Booger is not the scientific name for dried nasal mucus. booger is slang. This article if it is to exist should be under a scientific name 64.12.116.71 20:02, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but choose between snot and booger. I personally prefer snot, but since it disambiguates here, whatever.  While I do not support merging, I do support changing the name to a more scientific term. ~GMH 07:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Such as "nasal mucus"?...Just a possibility.~GMH 06:35, 26 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. Since when does Wikipedia only document scientific names?  See also, the previous deletion debate. --Mysidia (talk) 04:01, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Some articles should be under lay synonyms (e.g. vomiting vs. emesis) but not under slang terms. Others do better when they go under a scientific name; this should be done if the term itself is imprecise (e.g. stroke is less specific than cerebrovascular accident). JFW | T@lk  17:28, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. A well written article DEng 11:06, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. – Pladask 20:30, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mucus 161.243.63.172 23:10, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mucus (oh dear I'm a sheep) -- realwingus  10:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * This never got added to the main VfD page until now; adding. No vote.  JYolkowski // talk 15:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to mucus, and this term should definitely be mentioned in that article. Meelar (talk) 17:46, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to mucus. -- BD2412 talk 18:38, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. For fuck's sake, people. -HX 22:23, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to mucus. Wasn't that what we already decided? In (click, click) July? Why are we discussing this again? Dpbsmith (talk) 23:45, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to mucus. Nandesuka 02:46, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. --InvaderJim42 04:47, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. This is what had been decided previously. Proto t c 12:56, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. For fuck's sake, people. (Agreed.)
 * Merge to mucus -- (&#x263A;drini&#x266B;|&#x260E;) 19:14, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep As is, but cleanup a little bit. Booger, as a word, has more interest than mucus and would be totally inappropriate there. Hell, this article is already longer than that at mucus.SchmuckyTheCat 00:15, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to nasal secretion and cleanup. JFW | T@lk  17:26, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I feel the importance of the term booger needs to be given equal status to other encyclopedic terms because of its importance to our youth today. Sorna Doon 09:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think this would take over mucus if added there. I'm not totally against finding a suitable blanket term for booger, snot, etc... but, it doesn't belong on the same page as mucus. gren グレン 09:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I posted under my friend's name as we are visiting each other... and I forgot to change login... so, now I am fixing my mistake. gren グレン 09:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.