Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booger (childrens book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Booger (childrens book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability. Book is apparently self-published (only book Amazon has published by Marsgang ), has no notable third-party reviews (Kirkus, Library Journal, etc.) on its Amazon listing (which normally shows such things), has a sales rank of over 4,000,000. Worldcat search finds no copies in libraries. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. At first I thought it was a notable author until I realised it was not the Mary Phillips who has a WP article. Adpete (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any RS references to this book that could establish notability. 28bytes (talk) 06:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It is just a non-notable children's book with zero third party reliable sources. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  12:52, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, Sadads (talk) 00:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Edward321 (talk) 23:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't show enough notability. → Clementina  [  Scribble  ] 03:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.