Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booger Tree, Alabama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Booger Tree, Alabama

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There's nothing here on the topos besides a church named Walker Chapel and an accompanying cemetery. This says that Kidd Cemetery, Walker Chapel Cemetery, and Booger Tree Church Cemetery are the same place, so is Booger Tree an old name for Walker Chapel? The only newspapers.com result in Alabama papers is just a passing mention. I found one definitely not-RS mention in somebody's personal website, but beyond that, everything is just mirrors of either wikipedia or GNIS. I was expecting more coverage with a name this weird, but I'm seeing no indication in RS that WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG are met. Hog Farm Bacon 04:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 04:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 04:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * delete This one is another name scooped up in one of GNIS's fishing expeditions, in this case in the website of the Winston County Genealogical Society. I looked through their pages for uses of the name, and while one page calls it a "community" in passing, and another calls it a "place" and provides lat/long coordinates for it, and a third page has a picture of the chapel, they say nothing at any length, not so much as a full sentence. Topos do not ever acknowledge the name. I just don't see how this is notable. Mangoe (talk) 04:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: GEOFEAT points to GNG for places without legal recognition and this does not have multiple IS RS with SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: t | c | a  13:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.