Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Book Rights Registry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.. Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Book Rights Registry

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Well-sourced article; however this never came to pass. Doesn't feel appropriate to have an article about something that doesn't exist, even if the text were to be updated. Perhaps best replaced with a redirect to an existing article covering Google's history, to where a condensed version of the article facts could be relocated? CapnZapp (talk) 08:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Internet. CapnZapp (talk) 08:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't feel strongly, but would suggest a redirect to Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc. where this project/idea is already mentioned in its correct context. Any information lacking there could probably be merged from here. Elemimele (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. per nom. and Elemimele. If needed, merge any relevant content there Sal2100 (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: FWIW, I found article confusing, especially regarding the history. For instance, the lede uses future and present tense.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 03:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.