Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Book of Clout


 * This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. – ABCD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Book of Clout
Non-notable, possibly false or vandalism. delete. Jonathan Christensen 14:49, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Please don't call votes on perfect nonsense. It takes many folks' time to work through this process, which is for deletions where there is a possibility of doubt. Just mark pages like this delete Anyone can object to a plain delete, and send it through this elaborate process instead. --Wetman 14:52, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, sorry. I'm still getting used to the whole vfd/speedy delete process. Jonathan Christensen 05:04, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Dont delete. This page is obviously a creative outlet for some adolescents. They are simply exploring their religous and spiritual beliefs, and having some fun. We should support their creativity unstead of trampling it.
 * If "they" want to explore their creativity, I reccomend doing so on a free webhost where they can post nonsense to their heart's content. This is an encyclopedia. Halidecyphon 15:16, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash; No such book or religion. It's not even particularly creative. &mdash; RJH 16:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedied this Patent nonsense. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:51, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Dont delete. This page informing people of this religion which is what an encyclopaedia is for right? [User:BentGalaxy]


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.