Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bookbinder Soup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 19:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Bookbinder Soup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Violates WP:PROMO and WP:NOTGUIDE Anomalocaris (talk) 18:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep the recipe section needs to be reworked. But the article looks reasonable and appears to be sourced otherwise. Certainly improvements can be made. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sourced, seems notable, seems fine, if it were too promotional that should be addressed by editing. -- do ncr  am  02:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Further comment There appears to be a great deal of overlap with the heavily tagged article Old Original Bookbinder's. Merge? Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep not promotional, simply addresses what others have said about it. There aren't many sources out there.  Can't be promotional because it doesn't promote anything, the most close item to promotional is the section where it addresses the Drake's target market.  That agrees with many sources online.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkouassi (talk • contribs) 14:51, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.