Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Books Review On Jasmine Revolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 07:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Books Review On Jasmine Revolution

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be just what the title says, an essay reviewing books about the Jasmine Revolution. InShaneee (talk) 10:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. InShaneee (talk) 12:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:No original research. A highly promotional tone is used for several of the books, "referenced" by sales links, and I can't see anything worth merging to Arab Spring. Literature review on Jasmine revolution, created by an editor with a similar username was speedy deleted G11 a few weeks ago. Altered Walter (talk) 10:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1 Star, Would Not Recommend. There might be a site were something like this would be appropriate, but Wikipedia ain't it. Delete as per nom. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a website used for essays that are in violation of the original research guideline. TBrandley (what's up) 23:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Bibliography lists are a valid type of article, but Arab Spring has a much longer list of books, so I don't see any point in saving this. --Colapeninsula (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.